惠普 Omen Max 16 笔记本电脑评测：速度超快，但温度有点高最大统计数据。 Omen Max 16 配备了最新的英特尔 Arrow Lake 处理器和 Nvidia Maxwell 显卡，最高可达 Core Ultra 9 275HX 和GeForce RTX 5090。不过，CPU 尤其需要更强的冷却解决方案。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 05/05/2025 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇩🇪 🇷🇺 Blackwell RTX 5000 Intel Gaming Geforce Arrow Lake
结论 - 最快的 CPU 之一考虑到体积，Omen Max 16 的性能非常强大。它配备了与竞争对手联想Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 相同的 Core Ultra 9 275HX CPU 和 175 WGeForce RTX 5090 GPU，同时重量更轻、体积更小。该处理器尤其使惠普的性能超过了 Razer Blade 16 2025 或华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 等流行的 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑，因为它们分别仅限于 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 和 Core Ultra 9 285H。如果用户可以利用超快的酷睿 HX 处理器来处理工作负载，可能会发现 Omen Max 16 值得一试，尤其是它配备了与竞争对手类似的 OLED 面板和可以说更舒适的键盘。
Test device courtesy of HP
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
尽管 Arrow Lake HX CPU 的速度可能很快，但对于 Omen Max 16 来说，可能还是太快了。在负载情况下或游戏时，核心温度远远超过 90 C，而时钟频率却始终慢于上述Legion Pro 7i 16 上运行的相同处理器。虽然差距不大，但对性能要求极高的发烧友可能会因此更青睐联想或其他CPU温度更低但速度更慢的机型。
Pros+ 配备 G-Sync 技术的 240 Hz 高品质 OLED 面板
+ 易于访问的内存和固态硬盘插槽
+ 高达 175 瓦的 TGP 目标
+ 舒适的键盘
+ 支持 PCIe5 固态硬盘Cons- 游戏时 CPU 温度很高
- 酷睿至尊 9 275HX 可以更快
- 扬声器音量可以更大
- 不支持 HDR1000
- 体积较重
价格和供应情况惠普现已开始发售Omen Max 16，基本 RTX 5070 Ti 配置的起价为 2500 美元，我们评测的 RTX 5090 配置的起价为 4000 美元。
$2,799.99HP OMEN MAX 16-inch Gaming Laptop, Windows 11, Intel Core Ultra 9, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, WQXGA, Shadow Black
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Table of Contents结论 - 最快的 CPU 之一规格箱子 - 密集包装连接性输入设备 - 更熟悉、更明亮显示屏 - 240 Hz OLED，带 G-Sync 功能性能 - 负载情况下处理器温度很高排放量能源管理--要求极高的处理器笔记本检查评级Potential Competitors in Comparison
Omen Max 16 设计为 "普通 "Omen 16 的更大、更重、更快版本。 "普通 "预兆 16.它搭载了市场上速度最快的处理器，包括箭湖酷睿9 275HX CPU 和 175 W BlackwellGeForce RTX 5090 GPU，而许多较薄的竞争对手 "仅 "提供 H 系列处理器和较低的 TGP GPU。Omen Max 16 的目标是在性能方面尽量少走弯路--至少在理论上是这样。
该机型的较少 SKU 从配备酷睿至尊 7 255HX CPU 和 RTX 5070 Ti GPU 的 2K IPS 显示屏开始，售价为 2500 美元，到我们配备 1600p OLED 面板的全配置评测机，售价超过 4000 美元。
16 英寸游戏机的替代产品包括 微星 Vector 16 HX, 联想Legion 9 16或 雷蛇刀锋 16.
更多惠普评论：
ZBook Ultra G1a 14EliteBook X Flip G1iEnvy x360 15OmniStudio X 32Pavilion 16
规格
HP Omen Max 16 ah000ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.4 GHz, 156 W PL2 / Short Burst, 109 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HXGraphics adapterNvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 1597 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 175 W TDP, GDDR7, 572.62, Advanced OptimusMemory32 GB , SK Hynix, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 26-26-26-52Display16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, Samsung ATNA60DL02-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 240 HzMainboardIntel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)StorageWDC PC SN810 2TB, 2048 GB SoundcardIntel Arrow Lake-S PCH - ACE (Audio Context Engine)Connections2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm comboNetworkingRealtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 24.9 x 357 x 269Battery83 Wh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 ProCameraWebcam: 1080p30Primary Camera: 2 MPixAdditional featuresKeyboard: Beveled, Keyboard Light: yes, Omen Gaming Hub, HP Smart, 12 Months WarrantyWeight2.807 kg, Power Supply: 933 g
Price3800 USDAmazon$2,799.99LinksHP homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
箱子 - 密集包装虽然尺寸不同，但 Omen Max 16 在外观上与即将上市的 2024 Omen 16 非常相似，包括黑色磨砂配色、后部设计和铰链以及光滑的铝制表面。主要区别包括键盘和前缘的新 LED 灯条，这与最新的 Legion Pro 7i 16 G10 设计.
底座周围的制造质量依然出色，但机盖和铰链本应更加坚固，以获得更好的耐用性。例如，在调整角度时，盖子容易摇晃，按压屏幕后面的中心位置时，表面的弯曲程度比刀锋 16 或上述联想产品更大。
惠普确实在 "Omen Max 16 "中加入了 "Max"，因为该机型比即将推出的 Omen 16 更厚更重。重量的增加尤其明显，因为该系统比竞争对手如ROG Zephyrus G16或去年的Legion 9 16IRX9。即使对于 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑来说，这也是一个相当高密度的设计。
与标准版 Omen 16 相似的单色金属材料
加长的后部设计更小，不像最新的Legion Pro 7i 16 G10 那样激进
深色表面上很快就会留下指纹，但擦拭起来很方便
盖子打开到最大角度（~140 度）
方形通风栅保持不变
前沿新增 LED 灯条，以区别于旧款车型
尺寸比较
HP Omen 16 (2024) MSI Vector 16 HX A14V HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX DIN A4 ❌
连接性尽管外部和内部都发生了变化，但端口选项仍与 Omen 16 相同。这并不一定是坏事，因为该机型集成了大量可供选择的端口，与其他机型相比更具竞争力，但内容创作者可能会对缺少集成的 SD 读卡器感到遗憾。
前部无端口
右侧USB-A（10 Gbps）
左： 2x USB-C Thunderbolt 4 w/ DisplayPort 2.1 + Power Delivery，3.5 毫米耳机
交流适配器、RJ-45（2.5 Gbps）、HDMI 2.1、USB-A（10 Gbps）交流英特尔 BE200 标配 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4 连接功能。
可拆卸 WLAN 模块隐藏在冷却解决方案下方
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1781 (1669min, 1680.89P1 - 1877max) MBit/s +40%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel BE201 320MHz
1660 (1542min, 1547.8P1 - 1822max) MBit/s +31%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1392 (740min - 1497max) MBit/s +10%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1378 (539min - 1507max) MBit/s +9%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1270 (961min - 1408max) MBit/s MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
1188 (966min - 1409max) MBit/s -6% iperf3 receive AXE11000Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1708 (1681min, 1682.16P1 - 1731max) MBit/s +20%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1693 (1660min - 1709max) MBit/s +19%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel BE201 320MHz
1587 (1550min, 1555.51P1 - 1603max) MBit/s +12%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1562 (657min - 1677max) MBit/s +10%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1422 (1224min - 1482max) MBit/s MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
1268 (973min - 1456max) MBit/s -11% iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzLenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1569 (771min - 1600max) MBit/s +26%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
1419 (966min - 1534max) MBit/s +14%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1242 (1202min - 1314max) MBit/s iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzLenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1660 (1606min - 1685max) MBit/s +10%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1513 (1456min - 1541max) MBit/s MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
1045 (843min - 1252max) MBit/s -31%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1242 (1202-1314) HP Omen Max 16 ah000; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1512 (1456-1541)
网络摄像头标配 200 万像素网络摄像头，带红外和物理快门。
11.6 ∆E12.3 ∆E17.5 ∆E24.1 ∆E18.7 ∆E16.4 ∆E10.3 ∆E13.9 ∆E12.1 ∆E11 ∆E15.4 ∆E20.6 ∆E5.2 ∆E18.9 ∆E12 ∆E13.3 ∆E12.2 ∆E21.3 ∆E2.5 ∆E8.3 ∆E12.5 ∆E15.1 ∆E14 ∆E6.1 ∆EColorChecker HP Omen Max 16 ah000: 13.56 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 24.1 ∆E
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
维护只需一把普通的十字螺丝刀，就能轻松拆下底部面板。两个 M.2 2280 固态硬盘插槽和两个 SODIMM 插槽都有清晰的标签，方便最终用户升级。从技术上讲，WLAN 模块也是可拆卸的，但它位于散热解决方案的下方，因此拆卸起来比较困难。
Omen Max 16 2025 内部结构可持续性外盖和底盖由 100% 的回收铝制成，而掌托和屏幕周围的边框则由 30% 至 45% 的消费后回收塑料制成。
配件和保修包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外，没有任何其他附件。如果在美国购买，通常适用一年有限制造商保修。
输入设备 - 更熟悉、更明亮键盘惠普对键盘进行了改动，使其更像最近推出的 Omen Transcend 14 的 "零格 "键盘。 Omen Transcend 14.与Legion Pro 7i 16 G10 相比，RGB 背光更加鲜艳，但键入体验仍然不错，即使键入不浅，反馈也更轻。遗憾的是，这次的方向键变小了，而适当的数字键盘取代了 2024 设计中笨拙的 PgUp、PgDn、Home 和 End 键。
触摸板点击板尺寸与 2024 年的 Omen 16 相同，为 12.5 x 8 厘米。相比之下，Blade 16 或 Zephyrus G16 等同类机型的点击板更为宽敞，但 Omen Max 16 的点击并不灵活，这也是一种公平的权衡。
与 2024 机型上的 Chiclet 键盘设计相比，采用了全新的斜面键盘设计
点击板大小适中，按下时会发出咔哒声，反馈效果令人满意
由于反馈较轻且键程较浅，按键碰撞声相对较小
数字键盘和较小的方向键是 Omen 16 系列的新成员显示屏 - 240 Hz OLED，带 G-Sync 功能清晰的亚像素阵列，无颗粒感问题三星 ATNA60DL02-0 OLED 面板与最近推出的 Zephyrus G14 上的面板非常相似，包括 240 Hz 刷新率、P3 色彩支持、亮度级别，甚至脉宽调制行为。它能满足大多数游戏和内容编辑的需求。
支持 G-Sync 和 HDR500，但不支持 Windows VRR。在启用 HDR 的情况下，我们测得的最大亮度为 594 尼特；如果仅在 SDR 模式下，则为 391 尼特。
边缘到边缘的亮面保护，但不支持触摸屏
窄边框
379.1cd/m²374.5cd/m²376.1cd/m²383.8cd/m²376.5cd/m²378.2cd/m²390.7cd/m²388.2cd/m²388.7cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessSamsung ATNA60DL02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 390.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 381.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18.2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 96 %Center on Battery: 376.5 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE Color 3.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83, calibrated: 0.94ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.09-98 Ø5.198.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)Gamma: 2.25Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)
HP Omen Max 16 ah000Samsung ATNA60DL02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 HzHP Omen 16 (2024)BOE BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1", 240 HzAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WVATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 HzRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 HzMSI Vector 16 HX A14VChi Mei N160GME-GTB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 HzLenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090CSOT T3 MNG007ZA2-2, MiniLED, 3200x2000, 16", 165 HzDisplay-20%-0%-6%-6%-5% Display P3 Coverage99.768.6 -31%99.9 0%96.1 -4%95.4 -4%95.3 -4% sRGB Coverage10098.6 -1%100 0%99.9 0%99.7 0%99.9 0% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage98.270.6 -28%96.9 -1%85 -13%85.4 -13%86.6 -12%Response Times-3321%-2%12%-2096%-2066% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *0.29 ?(0.15, 0.14)14.1 ?(6.7, 7.4) -4762%0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11) 24%0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1) 31%5.7 ?(2.8, 2.9) -1866%12.6 ?(6.6, 6) -4245% Response Time Black / White *0.47 ?(0.25, 0.22)9.3 ?(4.6, 4.7) -1879%0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12) 47%0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12) 47%11.4 ?(6.5, 4.9) -2326%10 ?(5.2, 4.8) -2028% PWM Frequency960 ?(100)960960 ?(100)5430 PWM Amplitude *3155 -77%44 -42%8 74%Screen-21%0%11%-30%-22%Brightness middle376.5292 -22%416 10%391 4%557.2 48%631 68%Brightness382291 -24%418 9%393 3%506 32%664 74%Brightness Distribution9685 -11%96 0%98 2%83 -14%91 -5%Black Level *0.240.410.03Colorchecker dE 2000 *3.672.36 36%1.6 56%1.2 67%2.91 21%2.68 27%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *7.244.08 44%2.1 71%3.2 56%5.94 18%6.41 11%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *0.940.93 1%1.63 -73%2.68 -185%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.13 -173%2.7 -145%1.8 -64%3.8 -245%2.71 -146%Gamma2.25 98%2.101 105%2.16 102%2.2 100%2.23 99%2.27 97%CCT6319 103%5976 109%6331 103%6493 100%6408 101%6135 106%Contrast1217135921033Total Average (Program / Settings)-1121% /
-571%-1% /
-1%6% /
7%-711% /
-369%-698% /
-490%* ... smaller is better
对比 sRGB
对 P3与大多数 OLED 面板一样，显示屏开箱即按照 P3 标准进行了校准。
校准前灰度 (P3)
校准前的饱和扫描 (P3)
校准前的色彩校验器 (P3)
校准后的灰度
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的 ColorChecker
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White0.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.25 ms rise↘ 0.22 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey0.29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.15 ms rise↘ 0.14 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 960 HzAmplitude: 31 % ≤ 100 % brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.
The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
百分之百
75
50
百分之二十五
0%由于面板有光泽，在户外几乎总是不可避免地会产生眩光。
明亮阴天下的户外活动
室外阴凉处
明亮阴天下的户外活动宽广的 OLED 视角性能 - 负载情况下处理器温度很高
测试条件在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 和 Omen Gaming Hub 设置为性能模式。我们建议用户熟悉使用 Omen Gaming Hub 来调整系统配置文件和设置。不过，该软件远非完美，因为它将重要的设置隐藏在多个子菜单甚至店面后面。
处理器核心 Ultra 9 275HX Core Ultra 9 275HXOmen Max 16 中的 Core Ultra 9 275HX 可谓喜忧参半。一方面，它比表现不佳的 酷睿 i9-14900HX快得多。但另一方面，该处理器的运行速度却比大多数采用相同处理器的笔记本电脑要慢，包括最近的 Legion Pro 7i 16 10 代 慢 10%。这可能是由于惠普的设计具有更严格的散热限制，正如我们下面的压力测试部分所显示的那样。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5145 (5108.56-5171.97) HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2939 (2630.37-4041.1) Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø3112 (3034.67-3332.5) Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3489 (3470.41-3505.08) MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4502 (4406.26-4547) Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4648 (4505.52-4878.64) Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5698 (5601.46-5746.3)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
86.8 pt Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
85.7 pt MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
81.1 pt HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
80.1 pt Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 -2! Intel Core i9-13900HX
76.8 pt HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
73 pt Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
71.2 pt Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
69.4 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
67.7 pt Dell G16 7620 -2! Intel Core i7-12700H
49.1 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX -2! AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
46.3 pt Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
36597 (34151.5min - 36596.9max) Points +9%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30712 - 40970, n=17)
35740 Points +7%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
33449 (32761.6min - 33449.1max) Points MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
32996 (29988.8min - 32995.8max) Points -1%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
31109 Points -7%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
26876 (25414.3min - 26876.4max) Points -20%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
26660 Points -20%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
23805 Points -29%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
22080 Points -34%Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
17181 (15714.9min - 17181.1max) Points -49%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14085 Points -58%Cinebench R23 / Single Core
HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
2202 Points +3%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
2201 Points +3%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2195 Points +3%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2009 - 2267, n=17)
2192 Points +3%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
2133 Points 0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2128 Points Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
2039 Points -4%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2039 Points -4%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
1852 Points -13%Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
1726 Points -19%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1566 Points -26%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
14183 Points +8%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12026 - 16108, n=17)
14001 Points +6%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
13178 Points MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
12252 Points -7%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
11637 Points -12%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
10492 Points -20%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
10077 Points -24%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
9250 Points -30%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
8251 Points -37%Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
6582 Points -50%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5489 Points -58%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
846 Points +4%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (774 - 870, n=17)
843 Points +4%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
837 Points +3%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
831 Points +2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
817 Points +1%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
811 Points Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
800 Points -1%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
780 Points -4%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
719 Points -11%Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
662 Points -18%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
595 Points -27%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5746 (5601.46min - 5746.3max) Points +11%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (4756 - 6271, n=17)
5630 Points +9%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5172 (5108.56min - 5171.97max) Points Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
4685 (4358.72min - 4684.94max) Points -9%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
4547 (4406.26min - 4547max) Points -12%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
4320 (4198.59min - 4320.12max) Points -16%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
4041 Points -22%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3505 (3470.41min - 3505.08max) Points -32%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
3333 (3034.67min - 3332.5max) Points -36%Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
2652 (2479.7min - 2651.64max) Points -49%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2292 Points -56%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
336 Points +6%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (306 - 343, n=17)
332 Points +5%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
318 Points 0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
317 Points HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
311 Points -2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
310 Points -2%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
308 Points -3%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
295 Points -7%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
289 Points -9%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
249 Points -21%Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
246 Points -22%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
220 Seconds * -116%Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
184 Seconds * -80%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
162 Seconds * -59%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
159 Seconds * -56%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
140 Seconds * -37%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
117 Seconds * -15%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
105 Seconds * -3%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
102 Seconds * -0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
102 Seconds * Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (82 - 116, n=17)
95.9 Seconds * +6%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
90 Seconds * +12%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
123266 MIPS +18%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
122148 MIPS +17%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
117940 MIPS +13%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (98236 - 124155, n=17)
114149 MIPS +9%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
106033 MIPS +1%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
104686 MIPS HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
87555 MIPS -16%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
83714 MIPS -20%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
69676 MIPS -33%Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
65012 MIPS -38%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64457 MIPS -38%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
7217 MIPS +17%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
7131 MIPS +15%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
7018 MIPS +13%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
6931 MIPS +12%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6063 - 7149, n=17)
6743 MIPS +9%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6607 MIPS +7%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6252 MIPS +1%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6186 MIPS Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
6136 MIPS -1%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5727 MIPS -7%Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
5343 MIPS -14%Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=18)
19475 Points +6%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19081 Points +4%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
18322 Points MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
18185 Points -1%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
17207 Points -6%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
16490 Points -10%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15671 Points -14%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
12585 Points -31%Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
3064 Points +5%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2886 - 3160, n=18)
3058 Points +5%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3052 Points +5%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
2995 Points +3%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2942 Points +1%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
2923 Points 0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2917 Points Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
2729 Points -6%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (19105 - 25855, n=17)
22977 Points +8%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
22414 Points +6%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
21195 Points MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
20947 Points -1%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
20510 Points -3%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
18590 Points -12%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
15818 Points -25%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15407 Points -27%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
15068 Points -29%Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
11862 Points -44%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10167 Points -52%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2033 - 2292, n=17)
2207 Points +9%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2199 Points +8%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
2136 Points +5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2136 Points +5%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
2131 Points +5%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
2108 Points +4%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2034 Points Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
2012 Points -1%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
2008 Points -1%Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
1656 Points -19%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1594 Points -22%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
38.9 fps +11%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30.7 - 43.8, n=17)
38.2 fps +9%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
35 fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
32.2 fps -8%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
32.2 fps -8%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
29.7 fps -15%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
28.7 fps -18%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
25.9 fps -26%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
22.8 fps -35%Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
18.8 fps -46%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
18 fps -49%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
53.8 s * -30%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
46.8 s * -13%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
46.4 s * -12%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
45 s * -9%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
44.9 s * -8%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
42.8 s * -3%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (33.2 - 62.1, n=17)
42.5 s * -3%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
41.4 s * Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
40.6 s * +2%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
39.4 s * +5%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
36.9 s * +11%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dell G16 7620Intel Core i7-12700H
0.505 sec * -11%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXAMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4799 sec * -5%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4568 sec * Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
0.4312 sec * +6%Alienware m16 R1 AMDAMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
0.4255 sec * +7%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=17)
0.4139 sec * +9%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4132 sec * +10%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.401 sec * +12%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
0.3979 sec * +13%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX
0.3841 sec * +16%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3731 sec * +18%* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit5172 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit298 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit317 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)13178 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)811 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core2128 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core33449 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core1913 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core130.7 Points
Help... in comparisonCinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparisonAsus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min)
N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs91 ...MSI Vector 16 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU1794Minisforum BD795i SE R9 7945HX, Radeon 610M1799Minisforum BD790i R9 7945HX, Radeon 610M1828HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop1913SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU1940Intel Core i7-14700K i7-14700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 40901982 R9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G1991 ...
(max)
TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation5372
Performance Rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance Rating
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
93.6 pt HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
89 pt MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
86.5 pt Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84.4 pt Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
81.1 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
62.9 pt HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
61 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
37324 KRay/s +9%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (28067 - 39895, n=16)
35760 KRay/s +5%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
34180 KRay/s MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
28921 KRay/s -15%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
27535 KRay/s -19%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
23492 KRay/s -31%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
17684 KRay/s -48%AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (140254 - 200744, n=16)
179192 Points +3%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
173656 Points MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
145828 Points -16%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
142039 Points -18%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136486 Points -21%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
116017 Points -33%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
90778 Points -48%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6766 - 9734, n=16)
8653 MB/s +4%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
8315 MB/s MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
7118 MB/s -14%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7000 MB/s -16%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
5824 MB/s -30%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
5206 MB/s -37%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
4367 MB/s -47%AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
141362 Points +10%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (113887 - 140937, n=16)
133679 Points +4%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
130803 Points +2%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
129824 Points +1%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
128670 Points Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
88891 Points -31%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
64720 Points -50%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
19115 Points +56%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
16524 Points +35%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16268 Points +33%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (11172 - 14415, n=16)
13501 Points +10%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
12272 Points HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
12268 Points 0%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9089 Points -26%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72596 - 104217, n=16)
93609 Points +3%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
90980 Points Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
75107 Points -17%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
71401 Points -22%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68467 Points -25%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
61884 Points -32%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
44165 Points -51%AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
135370 MB/s +15%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
133395 MB/s +13%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (107195 - 136847, n=16)
127794 MB/s +8%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
118108 MB/s HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89269 MB/s -24%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82547 MB/s -30%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
79949 MB/s -32%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2085 MB/s +10%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1599 - 2263, n=16)
2044 MB/s +8%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2043 MB/s +8%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
1896 MB/s Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
1514 MB/s -20%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1273 MB/s -33%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
1233 MB/s -35%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
20284 KRay/s +10%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (14847 - 21542, n=16)
19227 KRay/s +4%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
18490 KRay/s MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15693 KRay/s -15%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
14791 KRay/s -20%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
12887 KRay/s -30%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
9420 KRay/s -49%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
58622 MPixel/s +20%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
54702 MPixel/s +12%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
51417 MPixel/s +5%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (39524 - 62916, n=16)
51244 MPixel/s +4%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
49514 MPixel/s +1%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
49135 MPixel/s 0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
49039 MPixel/s
压力测试运行 Prime95 显示了为什么 Omen Max 16 始终落后于Legion Pro 7i 16 G10，尽管它们都配备了相同的 Core Ultra 9 275HX 处理器。惠普处理器的主频为 2.5GHz、98C、108W，而联想处理器的主频为 3.8GHz、95C、156W。与 Omen Max 16 相比，后者能从 CPU 中获得更稳定的 Turbo Boost 性能。
用户应注意，三种电源配置文件之间存在性能差异：正如下面赛博朋克 2077 的截图所示，平衡、性能和释放三种电源配置文件之间存在性能差异。在 "释放 "模式下，GPU 功耗上限为 145 瓦，其次是 "性能 "模式下的 128 瓦和 "平衡 "模式下的 81 瓦。换句话说，玩家必须忍受惠普的最大风扇模式（即 "释放 "模式），才能获得 GPU 的全部功率。
游戏时 CPU 的温度比我们希望的要高，几乎达到 95 摄氏度，而 GPU 的温度则低得多，只有 70 摄氏度或更低。
系统空闲
赛博朋克 2077（平衡模式）
Prime95 压力
赛博朋克 2077》压力（性能模式）
Prime95+FurMark 压力
赛博朋克 2077》压力（释放模式）
平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz)
GPU 时钟 (MHz)
平均 CPU 温度 (°C)
平均 GPU 温度 (°C)
系统闲置
--
--
57
36
Prime95 压力
3.5
--
98
48
Prime95 + FurMark Stress
2.4
1747
94
77
赛博朋克 2077》压力（释放模式）
1.9
2347
94
64
赛博朋克 2077》压力（性能模式）
1.9
2182
94
68
赛博朋克2077压力（平衡模式）
1.6
1665
91
71
系统性能PCMark 10 的得分略低于预期，尤其是在对 CPU 性能要求最高的 "生产力 "子测试中。这可能是由于上文提到的处理器性能有些不尽如人意。
PCMark 10 标准
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total PCMark 10 / Score
HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
8915 Points +1%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
8864 Points +1%HP Omen Max 16 ah000GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
8794 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (8241 - 9497, n=8)
8767 Points 0%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
8664 Points -1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
8254 Points -6%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
8239 Points -6%PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
11385 Points +4%HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
11255 Points +3%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
11007 Points 0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
10969 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9994 - 11369, n=8)
10963 Points 0%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
10717 Points -2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
10626 Points -3%PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
11410 Points +25%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
11309 Points +24%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
10341 Points +13%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10202 Points +12%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9861 Points +8%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9122 - 10925, n=8)
9511 Points +4%HP Omen Max 16 ah000GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
9122 Points PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen Max 16 ah000GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
18445 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15507 - 19234, n=8)
17580 Points -5%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
15725 Points -15%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
15593 Points -15%HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
14976 Points -19%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
13889 Points -25%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
13516 Points -27%CrossMark / Overall
HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2234 Points +12%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1995 - 2339, n=8)
2212 Points +11%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2192 Points +10%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
2064 Points +3%HP Omen Max 16 ah000GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
1995 Points Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1939 Points -3%CrossMark / Productivity
HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2138 Points +16%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1847 - 2211, n=8)
2045 Points +11%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2033 Points +10%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1918 Points +4%HP Omen Max 16 ah000GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
1847 Points Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1755 Points -5%CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2285 - 2612, n=8)
2512 Points +10%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2443 Points +7%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
2416 Points +6%HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2349 Points +3%HP Omen Max 16 ah000GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
2285 Points Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2207 Points -3%CrossMark / Responsiveness
HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2195 Points +31%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1987 Points +19%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1673 - 2217, n=8)
1921 Points +15%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1769 Points +6%HP Omen Max 16 ah000GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
1673 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1604 Points -4%WebXPRT 3 / Overall
HP Omen Max 16 ah000GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
359 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (315 - 362, n=8)
344 Points -4%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
333 Points -7%HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
323 Points -10%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
322 Points -10%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
321 Points -11%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
279 Points -22%WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (317 - 341, n=7)
333 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
311 Points HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
309 Points MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
300 Points Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
268 Points Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
246 Points Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
535 ms * -27%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
450 ms * -7%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
443 ms * -5%HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
437 ms * -4%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
429 ms * -2%HP Omen Max 16 ah000GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
420 ms * Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (402 - 420, n=8)
411 ms * +2%* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score
8794 pointsHelp
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97515 MB/s +26%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
93640 MB/s +21%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
81940 MB/s +6%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (63022 - 94460, n=16)
81100 MB/s +5%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
79039 MB/s +2%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
78053 MB/s +1%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
77500 MB/s AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
102937 MB/s +22%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (65869 - 97151, n=16)
86818 MB/s +3%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
86537 MB/s +2%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85898 MB/s +2%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
84473 MB/s Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84192 MB/s 0%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
78309 MB/s -7%AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
103860 MB/s +34%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80589 MB/s +4%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (61633 - 90726, n=16)
78871 MB/s +2%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77715 MB/s 0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
77637 MB/s MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77312 MB/s 0%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
75293 MB/s -3%AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
128.7 ns * -8%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
118.7 ns * Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 151.7, n=16)
115.8 ns * +2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
103.6 ns * +13%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96.2 ns * +19%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84.1 ns * +29%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
81.8 ns * +31%* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟LatencyMon 显示，在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签页时会出现轻微的 DPC 问题，但在播放 4K60 视频内容时不会出现掉帧记录。
延迟监控
驱动程序列表
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
3220.2 μs * -112%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2448.1 μs * -61%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1602.6 μs * -6%HP Omen Max 16 ah000GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB
1516.1 μs * HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1248.3 μs * +18%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
492.6 μs * +68%* ... smaller is better
存储设备WDC PC SN810 WDC PC SN810我们测试装置中的固态硬盘在达到约 6800 MB/s 的稳定最大速度时不会出现节流现象。
CDM 8
AS 固态硬盘两个 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD 插槽，支持一个 PCIe5 驱动器
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdWDC PC SN810 2TBCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6749 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5118 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
744.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
486.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3536 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2618 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
66.16 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
132.9 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdWDC PC SN810 2TBSequential Read:
5105.48MB/s
Sequential Write:
3100.36MB/s
4K Read:
54.74MB/s
4K Write:
185.44MB/s
4K-64 Read:
1004.03MB/s
4K-64 Write:
2578.56MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.054ms
Access Time Write:
0.06ms
Copy ISO:
2884.45MB/s
Copy Program:
936.16MB/s
Copy Game:
1916.74MB/s
Score Read:
1569Points
Score Write:
3074Points
Score Total:
5355Points
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdWDC PC SN810 2TBDiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:
6766MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:
5187MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read:
3415MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write:
2570MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:
982MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:
520MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:
57.4MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:
149.4MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:
6758MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
94.5 pt Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
71.1 pt Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
65.7 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
58 pt MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.7 pt HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
52.6 pt DiskSpd
seq readHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5665 (5643.65min - 5664.83max) MB/s +66%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3790 (2816.71min - 3789.94max) MB/s +11%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3444 (3426.6min - 3444.12max) MB/s +1%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
3415 (3349.37min - 3415.42max) MB/s Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3347 (3203.49min - 3347.47max) MB/s -2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1607 (236.92min - 1606.84max) MB/s -53% seq writeHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5084 (5028.76min - 5083.81max) MB/s +98%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
3794 (3585.08min - 3793.54max) MB/s +48%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3750 (3377.21min - 3749.92max) MB/s +46%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3362 (2028.5min - 3361.51max) MB/s +31%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3134 (2912.36min - 3134.19max) MB/s +22%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
2570 (2187.36min - 2569.74max) MB/s seq q8 t1 readHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
7144 (6531.64min - 7143.5max) MB/s +6%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
6780 (5762.77min - 6780.16max) MB/s 0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
6766 (5345.22min - 6765.62max) MB/s Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6523 (5649.96min - 6522.56max) MB/s -4%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
6278 (5683.91min - 6278.45max) MB/s -7%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4985 (4341.19min - 4985.24max) MB/s -26% seq q8 t1 writeHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6117 (6097.29min - 6117.18max) MB/s +18%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
5861 (4855.26min - 5860.72max) MB/s +13%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
5187 (5110.55min - 5187.31max) MB/s Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
5092 (4641.78min - 5091.77max) MB/s -2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
4844 (4270.43min - 4843.96max) MB/s -7%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3176 (3161.84min - 3175.51max) MB/s -39% 4k q1 t1 readHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
85 (84.17min - 84.96max) MB/s +48%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
78.7 (77.61min - 78.69max) MB/s +37%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
69.2 (68.61min - 69.17max) MB/s +21%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
59.1 (58.3min - 59.06max) MB/s +3%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
58.1 (55.49min - 58.06max) MB/s +1%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
57.4 (57.08min - 57.42max) MB/s 4k q1 t1 writeHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
335 (331.92min - 334.81max) MB/s +124%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
265 (258.55min - 264.55max) MB/s +77%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
259 (209.68min - 259.39max) MB/s +73%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
209 (203.44min - 208.84max) MB/s +40%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
165.3 (162.66min - 165.27max) MB/s +11%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
149.4 (92.02min - 149.43max) MB/s 4k q32 t16 readHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5399 (5342.26min - 5399.42max) MB/s +450%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3189 (3182.48min - 3189.1max) MB/s +225%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2997 (2834.64min - 2996.72max) MB/s +205%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1524 (1514.94min - 1523.9max) MB/s +55%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
982 (747.27min - 982.13max) MB/s Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
848 (703.36min - 848.14max) MB/s -14% 4k q32 t16 writeHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3054 (2391.68min - 3054.16max) MB/s +487%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2673 (2401.6min - 2673.33max) MB/s +414%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
2210 (729.15min - 2210.24max) MB/s +325%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2071 (1783.46min - 2071.1max) MB/s +298%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
520 (486.41min - 520.16max) MB/s Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
456 (68.45min - 456.36max) MB/s -12%AS SSD
Score TotalHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10491 Points +96%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
7379 Points +38%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6847 Points +28%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
5355 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
4945 Points -8%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4740 Points -11% Score ReadHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3701 Points +136%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3215 Points +105%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2722 Points +73%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1732 Points +10%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1569 Points 0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
1569 Points Score WriteHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4927 Points +60%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
3074 Points Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2686 Points -13%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
2635 Points -14%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
2571 Points -16%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2177 Points -29% Seq ReadHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5868.59 MB/s +15%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
5105.48 MB/s Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
5081 MB/s 0%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
4884 MB/s -4%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4283.43 MB/s -16%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2272 MB/s -55% Seq WriteHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5326.5 MB/s +72%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
4160 MB/s +34%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3289 MB/s +6%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
3282 MB/s +6%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
3100.36 MB/s MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3058.55 MB/s -1% 4K ReadHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
78.67 MB/s +44%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
72.1 MB/s +32%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
64.4 MB/s +18%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
55.9 MB/s +2%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
54.74 MB/s MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.69 MB/s -4% 4K WriteMSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
512.49 MB/s +176%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
285.8 MB/s +54%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
230 MB/s +24%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
217 MB/s +17%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
188.6 MB/s +2%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
185.44 MB/s 4K-64 ReadHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3035.68 MB/s +202%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
2642 MB/s +163%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2439 MB/s +143%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1251.4 MB/s +25%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1009 MB/s 0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
1004.03 MB/s 4K-64 WriteHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4108.09 MB/s +59%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
2578.56 MB/s Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2168 MB/s -16%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
2090 MB/s -19%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
1926 MB/s -25%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1655.22 MB/s -36% Access Time ReadMSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.097 ms * -80%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
0.054 ms * Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
0.051 ms * +6%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.035 ms * +35%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
0.035 ms * +35%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.034 ms * +37% Access Time WriteMSI Vector 16 HX A14VWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.07 ms * -17%HP Omen Max 16 ah000WDC PC SN810 2TB
0.06 ms * Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.023 ms * +62%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SSSTC CA6-8D2048
0.021 ms * +65%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXWestern Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
0.019 ms * +68%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.017 ms * +72%* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6758 (5656.01-6797.71) HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6983 (6099.15-7013.53)
GPU 性能 - 175 W TGP 目标值手机 GeForce RTX 5090的速度仅比三年前的 移动 RTX 4090快 10%到 20%。在原始光栅化方面，移动 RTX 5090 只比三年前的移动 RTX 4090 快 10%到 20%。 台式机 RTX 5090的一半，但它仍然搭载了升级后的第五代张量内核，并支持 4:2:2 编码/解码，而这是旧版GeForce 40 系列所不具备的。
请注意，从 "释放 "模式降至 "性能 "模式只会降低几个百分点的 GPU 性能，如下表Fire Strike 所示。
电源配置文件图形得分物理得分综合得分释放模式493424402011675性能模式48146 (-2%)43466 (-1%)11522 (-1%)平衡模式45941 (-7%)43842 (-0%)11319 (-3%)电池供电15428 (-69%)23175 (-47%)2926 (-75%)3DMark 11
Fire Strike
Time Spy
快速通道
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
100 pt HP Omen Max 16 ah000Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
84.3 pt Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82.4 pt Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
81.6 pt Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
78.5 pt Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
74.3 pt MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
69.7 pt Alienware m16 R1 AMDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
68.1 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXNvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
66.5 pt HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
50.9 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX -1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
42.7 pt Dell G16 7620NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
33.7 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
88359 Points +22%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
72215 Points Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
71866 Points 0%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
70760 Points -2%Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (54052 - 76300, n=13)
67982 Points -6%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
62862 Points -13%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
60154 Points -17%Alienware m16 R1 AMDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
56373 Points -22%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXNvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
54052 Points -25%HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
45199 Points -37%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
40257 Points -44%Dell G16 7620NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
29412 Points -59%3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsKFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
65190 Points +33%Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (42516 - 62849, n=14)
52345 Points +7%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
52065 Points +6%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
49153 Points 0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
49115 Points Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
45696 Points -7%Alienware m16 R1 AMDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44782 Points -9%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44135 Points -10%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXNvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
42516 Points -13%HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
33058 Points -33%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
27562 Points -44%Dell G16 7620NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
21584 Points -56%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsKFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
27791 Points +12%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
24873 Points Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (19216 - 25763, n=14)
23832 Points -4%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
23003 Points -8%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
22082 Points -11%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
21279 Points -14%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19541 Points -21%Alienware m16 R1 AMDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
19365 Points -22%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXNvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
19216 Points -23%HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13282 Points -47%Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
11227 Points -55%Dell G16 7620NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
8855 Points -64%2560x1440 Time Spy ScoreKFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
25272 Points +10%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
22896 Points Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
21992 Points -4%Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (17820 - 24013, n=14)
21898 Points -4%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
20039 Points -12%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
18898 Points -17%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18392 Points -20%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXNvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
17820 Points -22%Alienware m16 R1 AMDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
17719 Points -23%HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13636 Points -40%Dell G16 7620NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9224 Points -60%
3DMark 11 Performance
48481 points3DMark Fire Strike Score
36501 points3DMark Time Spy Score
22896 pointsHelp... in comparison3DMark 11 in comparisonHP Stream 7 5700ng (min)
Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)183 ...Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop47965 i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 309047984 R9 7900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 309048185HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop48481Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop48486Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop48486 i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 309048533 ...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max)
R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 509082642
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTXDell G16 7620NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
31 Seconds * -158%HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
17 Seconds * -42%Alienware m16 R1 AMDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
16 Seconds * -33%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
14 Seconds * -17%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
13 Seconds * -8%Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9 - 18, n=13)
12.1 Seconds * -1%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
12 Seconds * -0%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXNvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
12 Seconds * -0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
12 Seconds * Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
12 Seconds * -0%KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
9 Seconds * +25% v3.3 Classroom CUDADell G16 7620NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
52 Seconds * -247%HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
28 Seconds * -87%Alienware m16 R1 AMDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
23 Seconds * -53%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
22 Seconds * -47%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
19 Seconds * -27%Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15 - 37, n=11)
18.4 Seconds * -23%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
18 Seconds * -20%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXNvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
18 Seconds * -20%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
18 Seconds * -20%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
15 Seconds * v3.3 Classroom CPUDell G16 7620NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
326 Seconds * -101%HP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
289 Seconds * -78%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXNvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
259 Seconds * -60%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
210 Seconds * -30%Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
198 Seconds * -22%Alienware m16 R1 AMDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
185 Seconds * -14%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
183 Seconds * -13%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
162 Seconds * Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (123 - 259, n=13)
158.4 Seconds * +2%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
148 Seconds * +9%* ... smaller is better
游戏性能台式机 RTX 5090 可与 4K 显示器完美搭配，而移动 RTX 5090 则可与 2K 或 3K 显示器完美搭配。在应用任何 DLSS 或 FG 功能之前，像《怪物猎人荒野行动》或《艾伦觉醒 2 》这样的高要求游戏已经可以在 2K 显示器上以最高设置运行超过 60 FPS。如果在外部 4K 显示器上进行游戏，建议使用 DLSS 和/或稍低的设置，以将帧数保持在 60 以上。
如果 FPS 为 60 或更低，则不建议使用多帧生成功能，因为根据我们在《艾伦- 唤醒 2》或《夺宝奇兵》中的体验，输入延迟会变得非常明显。建议采用更低的设置、更低的分辨率和/或 DLSS 性能模式来提高基本帧率，然后再应用多帧生成。
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Alan Wake 2 | Indiana Jones and the Great Circle | Monster Hunter Wilds | Assassin's Creed Shadows Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
156.2 (125.7min, 114.4P1) fps +3%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
151.9 (117.7min, 106.2P1) fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (105.3 - 167.3, n=14)
149.5 fps -2%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
118.6 (41.6min) fps -22%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
112.3 (87.5min) fps -26%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
105.3 (74.7min) fps -31%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
83.9 (35.4min) fps -45%2560x1440 Ultra Preset DLSS4 quality no FGHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
126.2 (109.2min, 104.4P1) fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (94.1 - 136.6, n=9)
119.8 fps -5%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
119 (102.5min, 98.2P1) fps -6%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
104.6 (74.9min) fps -17%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
94.1 (81.4min) fps -25%2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
111.3 (93.2min, 89.7P1) fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.2 - 120.5, n=16)
108.2 fps -3%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
99.8 (85.5min, 81.6P1) fps -10%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
98.6 (74.5min) fps -11%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
83.2 (70.1min) fps -25%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
79.4 (36.7min) fps -29%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
56.2 (30.7min) fps -50%3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off)HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
52.8 (44.1min, 41.9P1) fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (39.6 - 55, n=11)
51.6 fps -2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
50.7 (42.1min) fps -4%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
47.1 (38.4min, 36P1) fps -11%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
39.6 (33.6min) fps -25%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
36.6 (25.3min) fps -31%1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (80.6 - 84.9, n=3)
82.4 fps +2%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
80.6 (70min, 66.2P1) fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
73.4 (63.1min, 60.1P1) fps -9%MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
64.4 (38.8min) fps -20%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
43.8 (27.5min) fps -46%3840x2160 Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4xHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
90 (78.8min) fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.7 - 96.3, n=6)
90 fps 0%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
84.4 (73min) fps -6%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
83.7 (72.7min) fps -7%3840x2160 Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2xHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
50.4 (43.2min) fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (46.2 - 52, n=6)
49.4 fps -2%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
46.2 (39.8min) fps -8%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
41.7 (36.9min) fps -17%Alan Wake 2
1920x1080 High Preset + High Ray TracingAverage Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (70.9 - 72, n=2)
71.5 fps +1%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
70.9 fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
64.5 fps -9%3840x2160 High PresetHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
46.2 fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (33.4 - 49.3, n=10)
44.9 fps -3%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
43.1 fps -7%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
43 (12.9P0.1, 25.7P1) fps -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
33.4 (24P0.1, 25.8P1) fps -28%2560x1440 High PresetLenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
83.8 fps +1%Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (57.6 - 88.8, n=13)
83 fps 0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82.9 fps Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
76.7 (16.3P0.1, 33P1) fps -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
57.6 fps -31%3840x2160 High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4xAverage Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (116.3 - 125.7, n=3)
120.9 fps 0%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
120.6 fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
112.8 fps -6%3840x2160 High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2xAverage Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (65.8 - 71.1, n=3)
67.9 fps +3%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
65.8 fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
62.8 fps -5%3840x2160 High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSSAverage Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (38.2 - 39.4, n=3)
38.8 fps +2%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
38.2 fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
34.9 fps -9%Indiana Jones and the Great Circle
1920x1080 Very Ultra PresetHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
142.3 fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
129.2 fps -9%Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (87.7 - 142.3, n=12)
127.8 fps -10%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
119.6 (77.3P0.1, 85.6P1) fps -16%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
87.7 fps -38%2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset - DLSS QualityHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
120.6 fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
120.1 fps 0%Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (76.2 - 133.7, n=6)
114.1 fps -5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
113.9 (76.4P0.1, 82.5P1) fps -6%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
76.2 fps -37%3840x2160 Very Ultra PresetHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
68.6 fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (48.2 - 73, n=11)
65.1 fps -5%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
63.2 fps -8%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
62.3 (50.6P0.1, 52.7P1) fps -9%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
48.2 (40.2P0.1, 41.9P1) fps -30%2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame GenerationAverage Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (72.9 - 180, n=6)
98.5 fps +20%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82 fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
77.1 fps -6%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
72.9 (32.6P0.1, 33.8P1) fps -11%3840x2160 Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame GenerationAverage Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (51 - 109, n=5)
64 fps +24%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
51.8 fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
28.4 fps -45%Monster Hunter Wilds
1920x1080 ultra, RT: high, no upscalingLenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
90 fps +2%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
88.2 fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (66.4 - 95.3, n=10)
84.7 fps -4%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
68.06 fps -23%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
66.4 fps -25%2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, no upscalingHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
74.7 fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
73.2 fps -2%Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (54 - 80.5, n=10)
71.6 fps -4%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
65.61 fps -12%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
54 fps -28%2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, DLSS3 qualityLenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
87.7 fps +3%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
85 fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (63.9 - 92.8, n=6)
79.3 fps -7%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
68.57 fps -19%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
63.9 fps -25%3840x2160 ultra, RT: high, no upscalingHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
47.5 fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (33.4 - 50.8, n=10)
45.8 fps -4%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
45.2 fps -5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
44.07 fps -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
33.4 fps -30%3840x2160 ultra, RT: high, DLSS3 qualityHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
64 fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (57.6 - 69.2, n=5)
63.3 fps -1%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
61.8 fps -3%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
57.59 fps -10%Assassin's Creed Shadows
1920x1080 Ultra HighHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
70 (24min) fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (44 - 76, n=11)
66.5 fps -5%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
64 (27min, 35P0.1, 49P1) fps -9%Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
64 (43min) fps -9%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
44 fps -37%2560x1440 Ultra HighHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
55 (45min) fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
55 (41min) fps 0%Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (37 - 64, n=12)
54.7 fps -1%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
50 (31min, 33P0.1, 39P1) fps -9%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
37 fps -33%3840x2160 Ultra HighHP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
40 (33min) fps Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
40 (28min) fps 0%Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (35 - 46, n=9)
40 fps 0%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
35 (16min, 22P0.1, 27P1) fps -12%2560x1440 Ultra High + DLSS QualityLenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
65 (46min) fps +2%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
64 (50min) fps Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (45 - 76, n=7)
63.7 fps 0%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
62 (29min, 37P0.1, 46P1) fps -3%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
45 fps -30%3840x2160 Ultra High + DLSS QualityLenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
55 (43min) fps +4%Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (47 - 61, n=7)
54.4 fps +3%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
53 (43min) fps Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
47 (25min, 29P0.1, 37P1) fps -11%2560x1440 Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FGAverage Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (87 - 108, n=5)
100.6 fps +4%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97 (72min) fps Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
87 (66min, 68P0.1, 71P1) fps -10%3840x2160 Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FGAverage Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (66 - 84, n=5)
76.6 fps +4%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
74 (61min) fps Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
66 (52min, 53P0.1, 56P1) fps -11%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø151.4 (144.3-153.7)
lowmed.highultraQHD DLSSQHD4K DLSS4K FSR4KDota 2 Reborn (2015)
215
186.6
178.9
161
151.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
226
203
177.2
104.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
140.4
141.5
112.6
89.9
Strange Brigade (2018)
382
319
179.6
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)
173.7
171.6
161.5
151.9
126.2
111.3
80.2
46.4
52.8
Alan Wake 2 (2023)
82.9
69.7
46.2
F1 24 (2024)
152.2
151
104.3
87.9
52
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024)
142.3
120.6
115.9
68.6
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025)
88.2
85
74.7
64
47.5
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025)
70
64
55
53
40
排放量系统噪音在运行浏览器或视频等负载要求不高的情况下，风扇能很好地保持安静，脉动极小。反之，即使在平衡模式下，风扇的噪音也会很快变大，在 3DMark 06 的前 90 秒内，我们测得的噪音为 48 分贝（A）。遗憾的是，这种情况在游戏笔记本电脑上很常见。
在平衡、性能和释放模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，风扇噪音分别稳定在 45 dB(A)、55 dB(A) 和 61 dB(A)。建议使用 60 dB(A)或以上的耳机，因为在这个阶段，即使内部扬声器的音量也不足以克服风扇。如上文 GPU 部分所述，"释放 "模式能最大限度地发挥 GPU 的性能，但相对于噪音的大幅增加而言，其增益非常小。因此，玩家可能会考虑使用 "性能模式 "或 "平衡模式"。
冷却解决方案包括两个 ~60 毫米风扇、蒸汽室冷却器和一个液态金属热界面
自清洁功能可吹走积尘，有助于减少性能随时间的下降
CPU 和 GPU 标示清晰
可访问的 2x SODIMM 插槽风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：《赛博朋克 2077》，绿色：《赛博朋克 2077》：赛博朋克 2077》，绿色：释放模式）
Noise Level
Idle
29 / 29 / 29 dB(A)Load
47.7 / 61.1 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.8 dB(A)
HP Omen Max 16 ah000GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TBHP Omen 16 (2024)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101NAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048MSI Vector 16 HX A14VNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFHNoise1%4%4%-10%15%off / environment *22.825 -10%23.8 -4%24.1 -6%23.2 -2%23 -1%Idle Minimum *2929 -0%23.8 18%24.1 17%33.5 -16%23 21%Idle Average *2930 -3%27.2 6%30.6 -6%33.5 -16%23 21%Idle Maximum *2931 -7%31.3 -8%30.6 -6%33.5 -16%23 21%Load Average *47.746 4%47.6 -0%45.5 5%52.1 -9%39 18%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *54.851.3 6%48.2 12%Load Maximum *61.147 23%53.3 13%53.4 13%62 -1%55.56 9%Witcher 3 ultra *476255.32* ... smaller is better
温度游戏时，键盘和底盖上的热点温度分别可达 35 摄氏度和 46 摄氏度以上。这些区域位于机身后部，远离掌托、WASD 键或数字键盘等经常接触的区域。最明显的是，平均温度比我们在 2024 预兆 16摄氏几度，这可能是由于所有内部更新的缘故。
沿车尾和侧面排气
运行高负荷时，交流适配器的温度可达 45 摄氏度以上
Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
42.6 °C42.8 °C41.2 °C 37.2 °C36.8 °C36.2 °C 24.8 °C25 °C26 °C
Maximum: 42.8 °CAverage: 34.7 °C
45.2 °C50.2 °C44.2 °C36.2 °C43 °C37.2 °C29.2 °C31 °C28 °C
Maximum: 50.2 °CAverage: 38.2 °C Power Supply (max.) 46 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR ThermometerMax. LoadIdleCyberpunk
25.6 °C27.6 °C24.6 °C 24.8 °C25.6 °C24.6 °C 21.6 °C21.8 °C22.8 °C
Maximum: 27.6 °CAverage: 24.3 °C
25 °C26.2 °C25.2 °C24.8 °C25 °C23.4 °C22.8 °C23.2 °C23 °C
Maximum: 26.2 °CAverage: 24.3 °C Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR ThermometerMax. LoadIdleCyberpunk
32.4 °C35.4 °C33.4 °C 30.8 °C32.4 °C31.6 °C 21.4 °C22.6 °C26 °C
Maximum: 35.4 °CAverage: 29.6 °C
43 °C46.2 °C41.2 °C34 °C39 °C31.4 °C25.4 °C27.2 °C24.8 °C
Maximum: 46.2 °CAverage: 34.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 46.6 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
系统空闲（C 盖）
系统空闲（D 盖）
赛博朋克 2077》压力（C 封面）
赛博朋克 2077》压力（D 封面）
Prime95+FurMark 强调（C 封面）
Prime95+FurMark 强调（D 封面）
HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 LaptopHP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPUAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 LaptopRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 LaptopMSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPULenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPUHeat-4%4%-10%11%-31%Maximum Upper Side *42.847 -10%44 -3%48.3 -13%36.4 15%56 -31%Maximum Bottom *50.257 -14%44.1 12%53.3 -6%35.6 29%53 -6%Idle Upper Side *27.625 9%26.1 5%28.3 -3%26.6 4%38 -38%Idle Bottom *26.226 1%25.5 3%30.3 -16%27 -3%39 -49%* ... smaller is better
发言人前角附近有向下发射的立体声扬声器
粉红噪声显示出良好的平衡，但最大音量仅为 78 dB(A)，与微星 Vector 16 HX 的 85 dB(A)相比，令人难以接受。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)HP Omen Max 16 ah000 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理--要求极高的处理器耗电量由于 OLED 面板和 GPU 设置的不同，在桌面上空转时的功耗差别很大。例如，在亮度设置为最低的省电 iGPU 模式下，空转功耗可低至 10 W，而在亮度为最高的高性能 dGPU 模式下，空转功耗为 47 W，屏幕显示全白。
在同时运行 Prime95 和 FurMark 时，即使是在 "释放 "模式下，功耗也会在 130 瓦到 270 瓦之间循环，这表明在完全受压的情况下保持性能稳定存在问题。虽然这种极端负载并不常见，但在大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑上运行相同的测试，结果会更加稳定和一致。
运行《赛博朋克 2077》所需的电量明显高于 ROG Zephyrus G16 或 刀锋 16这可能是因为惠普采用了 HX 系列 CPU 和更高的 TGP 目标。
当 CPU 和 GPU 处于完全受压状态时，我们可以记录到 330 W 大型交流适配器（约 20 x 9 x 2.5 厘米）的最大功耗为 309 W。
3DMark 06 消耗量
赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超高清消费
在启动 Prime95 应力时，功耗会飙升至 209 W，然后由于热限制而下降并稳定在 130 W。
Prime95+FurMark 在 10 秒处启动压力。注意 1 分 20 秒后的波动率
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.29 / 2.1 WattIdle 9.9 / 28.6 / 47.1 Watt
Load
141.8 / 233 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
HP Omen Max 16 ah000Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, WDC PC SN810 2TB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"HP Omen 16 (2024)i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXUltra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, SSSTC CA6-8D2048, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"MSI Vector 16 HX A14Vi9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, MiniLED, 3200x2000, 16"Power Consumption13%31%25%-5%-17%Idle Minimum *9.99 9%9.4 5%10.9 -10%15.8 -60%20.5 -107%Idle Average *28.616 44%13.6 52%13.5 53%23.3 19%27.7 3%Idle Maximum *47.135 26%15.8 66%13.7 71%30 36%32.1 32%Load Average *141.8129 9%115.4 19%120.2 15%123.9 13%105 26%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *230160.4 30%177.6 23%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *253164.5 35%178.2 30%Load Maximum *233285 -22%216.7 7%246.1 -6%306 -31%323 -39%Witcher 3 ultra *150.8285246* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø228 (108.1-308) Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø340 (297-384) HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø10.1 (8.29-17.7) Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø36.9 (36.1-43.6) HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø253 (231-293) Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø318 (298-338)
Power Consumption external Monitor
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø130.4 (116.9-209) Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø238 (220-263) HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø153.1 (135.6-202) Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø241 (239-242) HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø241 (233-251) Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø244 (232-256) HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø16.2 (14.4-23.4) Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø29.5 (28.5-38.9) HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø230 (219-236) Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø319 (310-326)
电池寿命330 瓦交流适配器在类似的平衡电源配置文件和 iGPU 设置下，WLAN 运行时间与我们在 2024 Omen 16 上记录的时间几乎完全相同。虽然乍听之下有些乏善可陈，但请记住，与旧机型的 IPS 面板相比，我们的 2025 机型采用了要求更高的高分辨率 OLED 面板。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
8h 42min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 11min
HP Omen Max 16 ah000Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 83 WhHP Omen 16 (2024)i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 WhAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXUltra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 WhRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 WhMSI Vector 16 HX A14Vi9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 WhLenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.99 WhBattery Runtime1%54%36%12%33%Reader / Idle522641 23%WiFi v1.3350352 1%540 54%475 36%332 -5%290 -17%Load7184 18%129 82%H.264592294Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd71
笔记本检查评级
Back to the verdict
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
- 05/03/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Chassis82 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard92%
Connectivity70 / 80 → 87%
Weight58 / 10-68 → 82%
Battery68 / 95 → 71%
Display84%
Games Performance94%
Application Performance90%
AI Performance100%
Temperature90 / 95 → 94%
Noise56 / 90 → 63%
Audio77%
Camera38 / 75 → 50%
Average67%
82%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials50%Packaging100%Power Use73.8%Repairability50%Software Updates22.3% Total Sustainability Score: 49.4%
Potential Competitors in Comparison
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay
1.81.9%HP Omen Max 16 ah000Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDAmazon: $2,799.99List Price: 3800 USD2.8 kg24.9 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIOLED
2.86.7% v7 (old)HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,282.00HP Omen 16 2024 Gaming Lapto...2. $1,149.00HP OMEN 16 inch Laptop, FHD ...3. $1,340.99HP OMEN 16 inch Laptop, FHD ...List Price: 3200 Euro2.4 kg23.5 mm16.10"2560x1440182 PPIIPS
3.90%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXIntel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $5,554.00HIDevolution [2025] ASUS ROG...2. $5,449.00EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ...3. $80.99240W Rectangle Charger for A...List Price: 4799€1.9 kg17.4 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIOLED
4.87%Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $6,349.60Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop...2. $6,698.00Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop...3. $5,495.00Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop...List Price: 4399€2.1 kg17.4 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIOLED
5.88% v7 (old)MSI Vector 16 HX A14VIntel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $45.99Smatree Hard EVA Protective ...2. $59.99Smatree 16 inch Laptop Sleev...3. $55.99Smatree MS112 Hard EVA Prote...List Price: 2700 USD2.7 kg28.55 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIIPS
6.83.9%Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDAmazon: $4,999.00List Price: 4899 Euro2.5 kg22.7 mm16.00"3200x2000236 PPIMiniLED
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5339 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011contact me via: @AllenNgoNBCTranslator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 567844 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!